Candidate lookup journey
Start from all candidates, then open one profile to verify affidavit, vote share, and track record.
Open candidates → Read focused answerDirect answer Medium confidence
Treat this as a two-layer check: first publish measurable election behavior (vote share, conversion, near misses, overlaps), then separately evaluate ideological claims with direct citations. Without that second layer, a B-team verdict is incomplete.
Electoral behavior metrics are measurable; ideological intent assertions need explicit source-backed evidence beyond current aggregate API fields.
| Dimension | Use now | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Vote-share shifts | Yes | Shows electoral movement, not ideology by itself |
| Seat conversion and near misses | Yes | Shows performance pressure, not organizational alignment |
| Ideological/organizational linkage | Partial | Needs explicit source citations beyond numeric aggregates |
Electoral behavior dimensions are fully measurable. Ideological proxy claims require explicit, citable evidence beyond aggregate performance — not yet available in API data.
This page evaluates electoral behavior indicators. It does not claim final ideological alignment without direct, citable evidence beyond aggregate performance data.
Start from all candidates, then open one profile to verify affidavit, vote share, and track record.
Open candidates → Read focused answerFind your constituency first, then move to winner and challenger profiles in one click.
Open constituencies → Read focused answerCompare party-level fielding and quality metrics, then drill into candidate-level evidence.
Compare parties → Read focused answerGo from politician profile to promise tracker and validate supporting evidence links.
Verify promises → Read focused answer